30 Apr
2013
30 Apr
'13
9:16 p.m.
Peter Dunkley writes:
If you look at the recent (yesterday and today)
discussion on DISPATCH
the conclusion appears to be that this is how it should work and that
RFC 5626 should have been clearer on the behaviour.
i read the discussion and don't understand why would route set change.
if ua looses connection to its proxy, it sets up a new one, but the
proxy (which is in the route set established by r-r headers) is still
the same.
-- juha