Hi @sergey-safarov,

Thanks for reaching out. Do you have a reproduction case for this, or is it only in production that you see the issue? I'm not familiar with the semantics of recv(MSG_PEEK) on outbound connections. I didn't know this code was being called for outbound as well.

I've spent some time last night and this morning looking through this, and I can't spot anything out of place immediately. One thing though: if this is an outbound connection being setup, why is state == S_CONN_ACCEPT, instead of S_CONN_INIT, which is supposed to be the initial invalid state? Also, I can see in your backtrace that port is 32519. Wouldn't that make it an inbound connection?

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.