Hello,
not clear now what you try to do, but have in mind that avps are
attached to a sip message or transaction. You cannot access it if it is
set in other process for a transaction you don't have access to it
anymore. Use some other sort of shared memory structure.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/2/12 2:12 PM, Jason Penton wrote:
Hey Daniel,
plse see inline:
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
On 10/2/12 1:58 PM, Jason Penton wrote:
Okay I solved this by using the
uas->request structure ;)
indeed, this is the right way -- forgot to answer
this email...
np, thanks!
One more question re. async "pattern" Daniel:
In the "continued" code, prior to executing the config file
actions, can you add an avp (ie from within the code prior to
calling t_continue, can we add an avp and have it available to
the config file in the "continued" route block)?
IIRC, at that moment you have to add it to the list that is stored
in transaction. Maybe you can use a $var() and then move it in avp
list inside the continued route block.
Im not sure I understand you here? Just to make sure I am clear. I am
effectively trying to do this:
longrunningfunction(); #this is where the async will happen, so the
next line will be run by another process
if ($avp(s:return_val_from_longrunningfunction) > 0) {
blah;
}
So, I am asking how I can set the
$avp(s:return_val_from_longrunningfunction). I can tell you from
practice that it doesnt work using the default add_avp from within my
async callback process. I have not researched yet how the avps are
stored, architected, etc. But I am imagineing that right now the
process I am in has no "access" to avp "storage". Either that or the
avp "storage" is overwritten with the t_continue code? Would be great
if you could shed some light?
Cheers,
Daniel
cheers
Jason
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Jason Penton
<jason.penton(a)gmail.com <mailto:jason.penton@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi (Daniel this may be for you re. async)
Is it possible to get the sip message from a transaction
after using t_continue. The reason I ask is that using the
async "pattern", how would one be able to use transactional
replies in code using t_reply(code, message). Is the only way
to store the sip_msg in shm for later use, because if I look
at TM I see there is no storage for the original SIP request?
Cheers
Jason
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>
-http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012 -http://asipto.com/u/kat
Kamailio Advanced Training, Miami, USA, Nov 12-14, 2012 -http://asipto.com/u/katu