On 10/30/13 7:08 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
It is no a problem to add a patch that will
enhance for defining trees
that load from a table that has tname, But should not break the other one.
which
case it is that the patch breaks? perhaps it is possible to
enhance the patch avoid breaking existing behavior.
# cat utils/kamctl/mysql/mtree-create.sql
INSERT INTO version (table_name, table_version) values ('mtree','1');
CREATE TABLE mtree (
id INT(10) UNSIGNED AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL,
tprefix VARCHAR(32) DEFAULT '' NOT NULL,
tvalue VARCHAR(128) DEFAULT '' NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT tprefix_idx UNIQUE (tprefix)
);
INSERT INTO version (table_name, table_version) values ('mtrees','2');
CREATE TABLE mtrees (
id INT(10) UNSIGNED AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL,
tname VARCHAR(128) DEFAULT '' NOT NULL,
tprefix VARCHAR(32) DEFAULT '' NOT NULL,
tvalue VARCHAR(128) DEFAULT '' NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT tname_tprefix_tvalue_idx UNIQUE (tname, tprefix, tvalue)
);
As you can see from above sal table definitions, 'mtree' doesn't have
tname column and you introduced a constraint that a table is loaded only
when 'tname' column is present. So practically, the module doesn't work
anymore with such table structure.
I could suggest adding a new attribute to table definition, such as
'multiple=1' (derived from the fact that a db table has records for
multiple trees), which when present, the load operation will do the
query with WHERE condition on tname. Otherwise, will do it like it was
so far.
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Nov 25-28
- more details about Kamailio trainings at
http://www.asipto.com -