24 Aug
2009
24 Aug
'09
2:08 p.m.
On 24.08.2009 13:58 Uhr, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
ok, I see. Solutions:
- stress Andrei and/or other RPC devels :-)
- add missing/needed MI commands to s modules
I am considering merging sl module -- seems to be one preventing using
easy some modules from both sides.
You can still use one interface though - MI is
fully available and does
(pseudo) async xmlrpc commands.
that is not true if you use modules from both s and k (like domain
domain module, for example, that is much more advanced in s).
besides, s xmlrpc interface is much better that
k's, because it each
call executes a config file route block, that allows (among other things)
access control.
With this one I agree.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
* http://www.asipto.com/