Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
When used haproxy protocol then from client perspetive TCP connection established to loadbalancer IP address.
Real Kamailio listener may be IPv6 and expected to see $RAut value with IP of load balancer IP.
Really I can see for first message from the client
sip:2600::6:45060;transport=tcp
For second message
Advertised socket URI: sip:[2600::6]:5060
For first case missed [] in the IP and expected to see loadbalancer IPv4 because client use IPv4 to establish connection to Kamailio.
Used loadbalancerserver IP from haproxy protocol for $RAut value and for Record-Route headers generation.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.