Hello,
thanks reporting and for laborious troubleshooting.
I just did a commit for it, seems nobody was using profiles with no
value for long time. Can you try the patch from commit
028e3cc1a34f1e682d604a7c0e3fb1a7da03a211 done on GIT master?
If all ok, I will backport.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/27/10 7:25 PM, Eugene Oden wrote:
no segfault if i use the 3 parameter invocation of
get_profile_size(),
flagging the profile as "with value" and passing a static value to
get_profile_size() and set_dlg_profile()
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Eugene Oden
<eugeneoden+list(a)gmail.com <mailto:eugeneoden%2Blist@gmail.com>> wrote:
one more clue:
767 if(sp_dest->setf(msg, &sp_dest->pvp, (int)EQ_T,
&val)<0)
(gdb) p sp_dest->setf
$1 = (pv_setf_t) 0xffffffff
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Eugene Oden
<eugeneoden+list(a)gmail.com <mailto:eugeneoden%2Blist@gmail.com>>
wrote:
hello,
just started using the dialog module with kamailio 3.1.0 and
getting segfaults whenever get_profile_size() is executed.
here's a stack trace:
Core was generated by `kamailio'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x003c729e in w_get_profile_size (msg=0x834d8b4,
profile=0xb60823f8 "\224$\b\266\t", value=0x831cb40 "\004",
result=0x8340900 "\001") at dialog.c:767
767 if(sp_dest->setf(msg, &sp_dest->pvp,
(int)EQ_T, &val)<0)
(gdb) bt
#0 0x003c729e in w_get_profile_size (msg=0x834d8b4,
profile=0xb60823f8 "\224$\b\266\t", value=0x831cb40 "\004",
result=0x8340900 "\001") at dialog.c:767
#1 0x08057770 in do_action (h=0xbff5fcb8, a=0x8328f2c,
msg=0x834d8b4) at action.c:1105
#2 0x0805ea3c in run_actions (h=0xbff5fcb8, a=0x8328f2c,
msg=0x834d8b4) at action.c:1553
#3 0x080576c0 in do_action (h=0xbff5fcb8, a=0x832c794,
msg=0x834d8b4) at action.c:711
#4 0x0805ea3c in run_actions (h=0xbff5fcb8, a=0x832c794,
msg=0x834d8b4) at action.c:1553
#5 0x0805ed71 in run_actions_safe (h=0xbff606e8, a=0x832c794,
msg=0x834d8b4) at action.c:1605
#6 0x080f5d44 in rval_get_int (h=0xbff606e8, msg=0x0,
i=0xbff600d8, rv=0xbff5f694, cache=0x0) at rvalue.c:904
#7 0x080fb4fb in rval_expr_eval_int (h=0xbff606e8,
msg=0x834d8b4, res=0xbff600d8, rve=0x832c9c4) at rvalue.c:1866
#8 0x080fb5d0 in rval_expr_eval_int (h=0xbff606e8,
msg=0x834d8b4, res=0xbff60394, rve=0x832cdac) at rvalue.c:1873
#9 0x08057511 in do_action (h=0xbff606e8, a=0x832db7c,
msg=0x834d8b4) at action.c:1069
#10 0x0805ea3c in run_actions (h=0xbff606e8, a=0x832be40,
msg=0x834d8b4) at action.c:1553
#11 0x080576c0 in do_action (h=0xbff606e8, a=0x8313b88,
msg=0x834d8b4) at action.c:711
#12 0x0805ea3c in run_actions (h=0xbff606e8, a=0x83003cc,
msg=0x834d8b4) at action.c:1553
#13 0x0805ecf4 in run_top_route (a=0x83003cc, msg=0x834d8b4,
c=0x0) at action.c:1626
#14 0x080dceab in receive_msg (
buf=0x82a7740 "INVITE sip:*98@pipeline.bbpsphone.net
<mailto:98@pipeline.bbpsphone.net> SIP/2.0\r\nCall-ID:
6fb1466b73075c7ad55f278f86ff6b27@0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0\r\nCSeq: 2
INVITE\r\nFrom: \"Eugene Oden\"
<sip:goden.atl1@pipeline.bbpsphone.net
<mailto:sip%3Agoden.atl1@pipeline.bbpsphone.net>>;tag=56dc2460\r\nTo:
"..., len=1538, rcv_info=0xbff608f8)
at receive.c:205
#15 0x0816eef7 in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:532
#16 0x080ad9e1 in main_loop () at main.c:1554
#17 0x080b1126 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbff60bd4) at main.c:2398
and the relevant bits of configuration - not sure if its correct:
...
loadmodule "dialog.so"
modparam("dialog", "dlg_flag", 4);
modparam("dialog", "profiles_no_value",
"voicemail");
...
route {
...
if (is_method("INVITE")) {
dlg_manage();
setflag(4);
}
...
if (! route(LIMIT_VOICEMAIL)) {
xdbg(" SCRIPT: Voicemail limit exceeded\n");
sl_send_reply("503", "Service Unavailable");
exit;
}
...
}
...
route[LIMIT_VOICEMAIL] {
get_profile_size("voicemail", "$avp(size)");
if ($avp(size) >= 1) {
return -1;
}
set_dlg_profile("voicemail");
return 1;
}
any thoughts?
gene
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev