30 Aug
2013
30 Aug
'13
8:32 p.m.
On 8/30/13 5:57 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
30 aug 2013 kl. 17:52 skrev Peter Dunkley
<peter.dunkley(a)crocodilertc.net <mailto:peter.dunkley@crocodilertc.net>>:
Definitely and we
always welcomed such discussions.
My initial remark was just to set context that just generic statements
should now weight substantially at this moment. I'm for try and decide
later, based on direct experiences, rather that rush and then have to
revert or live with a more complex situation. And I proposed a gradual
approach, it does not mean it has to be that one.
Andreas had also good remarks/suggestions and can be (part of) the
solution for a while. Still someone will have to do a bit of work...
volunteers?
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Oct 21-24; Miami, Nov 11-13, 2013
- more details about Kamailio trainings at http://www.asipto.com -
Hello,
I just want to add, that my comments about GitHub being easier to
manage were entirely theoretical as I am one of those not involved in
managing the servers. I merely added it as it is one of the many
(perceived at least) advantages of a cloud deployment - and someone
did ask what the advantages were.
It might be that GitHub is entirely inappropriate for Kamailio, but I
don't think it does any harm for someone to ask these kinds of
questions from time-to-time as we are in an ever-changing landscape
in terms of what is on offer out there. I'd like to think the
decision not to use something that is currently considered to be the
"best-of-breed" option by the open-source community is a deliberate one.
+1 to that. We should always have an open discussion and keep asking
these questions. Why do we do what we do, and the way we do it?