[sr-dev] Re: [kamailio/kamailio] Python exception handling fixes (PR #4044)

I think the code is better how it is because the second parameter of the function you gave as example in the issue has to be a valid string. In the current form, it indicates there is a problem with the parameter, rather than having it silently not doing anything when it was expected to be a change of the value. As commented in the issue, use sr-users mailing list if you want to discuss further. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4044#issuecomment-2508904860 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/4044/c2508904860(a)github.com>