Re: [sr-dev] Conflict between libcurl4-gnutls-dev and libcurl4-openssl-dev (Debian)

2009/6/23 Iñaki Baz Castillo ibc@aliax.net:

If Debian wants to provide official SR packages, them they could choose to use the GnuTLs version instead (by creating their own "control" file).

ops, my mistake. The *already* compiled DEB packages don't require de -dev packages, of course, but just the runtime libraries (libcurl3 or libcurl3-gnutls).

Some questions:

- If the deb package is compiled with libcurl4-openssl-dev, could the deb package itself require libcurl3-gnutls instead of libcurl3? Would it work?

- If there any licence issue if a DEB package requires libcurl3 (OpenSSL)?

- If there any licence issue if an *official* DEB package is compiled with libcurl4-openssl-dev instead of libcurl4-gnutls-dev?