23 Jun
2009
23 Jun
'09
8:54 a.m.
2009/6/23 Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>et>:
If Debian wants to provide official SR packages, them
they could
choose to use the GnuTLs version instead (by creating their own
"control" file).
ops, my mistake. The *already* compiled DEB packages don't require de
-dev packages, of course, but just the runtime libraries (libcurl3 or
libcurl3-gnutls).
Some questions:
- If the deb package is compiled with libcurl4-openssl-dev, could the
deb package itself require libcurl3-gnutls instead of libcurl3? Would
it work?
- If there any licence issue if a DEB package requires libcurl3 (OpenSSL)?
- If there any licence issue if an *official* DEB package is compiled
with libcurl4-openssl-dev instead of libcurl4-gnutls-dev?
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>