Frederico, the problem is that the code is already in ..... there could be
other ppl using it, so I think it would be unfair to just remove it. We
have 2 solutions here:

1. move to a modparam.
2. move it to a vendor-specific AVP

Finally, we will need to find someone who has time/priority to get this
done... if you are worried only about the std, then I think it's a low
priority. If it's affecting your ability to use Kamailio, then it's of
course higher priority.

On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 at 14:34 Federico Favaro <notifications@github.com>
wrote:

> Sorry if i insist on the point...but really i do not see the point in
> leaving such AVP. To me is sufficient a feedback like "Our HSS is caring
> about this AVP, because we have a custom HSS that....etc...etc". I will
> close the PR or add a modparam and that's ok. This way we can for sure have
> a fallback, but basically we are mantaining an "out-of-standard" thing
> (that, btw, even wireshark doesn't decode) without knowing if it is really
> needed or not.
>
> Anyway, copy that, with low priority i will try to find some time to add a
> modparam if really needed
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
>
>
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/659#issuecomment-228334020>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ABI0d_gufKE3DAJL36sFWo9tepQP1C0Qks5qO85EgaJpZM4Iu6pk>
> .
>

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.