On 1/21/10 4:17 PM, Aymeric Moizard wrote:
Last general question: What about mixing kamailio & ser? I've seen for example modules with same namings: "auth" and "auth_db" in both modules_s & modules_k: does this means we can use the same core but have to choose between using modules_s or modules_k?
You can mix, but not arbitrarily. The biggest difference between ser and kamailio is the database structure. ser uses a new database schema with numeric user-ids which map to SIP AoR. kamailio still uses the old (ser 0.9.x) database schema where every user has a fixed AoR.
Therefore you can not mix modules which require different database layouts.
Thus, in your scenario you have to mix database layouts: provisioning/location from ser and presence from kamailio. That might work. But probably much easier would be to use kamailio modules only (unless you need numeric user ids).
Then my first comment would be: why have the "pa" been removed
I guess it was no longer update to work with latest core and db apis.
if it's not possible to use the presence module from kamailio...
you can use them, they are pretty much independent of the subscriber table and profile, you just create the afferent tables from kamailio.
In my mind, presence & presence_xml are using different independant database table and doesn't conflict with ser database?
Right.
Most probably, there could be conflict with modules that depends on usrloc for example? (like pua_usrloc) Looking at developper APIs, for both usrloc kam/ser modules they are very close.
I haven't checked ser usrloc, we did some changes in K, some of them for presence purpose and for using the pua_usrloc you have to use K usrloc and registrar modules and from here nathelper module.
I don't fully understand yet what "numeric user ids" are, but I would really like to use the ser database layout for user/location/credentials which seems really flexible compared to kamailio.
Doing auth with ser modules and using presence/usrloc from K should be just fine.
So where sip-router is going? Do you target to have only the same core for both kamailio & ser, but still be different projects?
Goal is to remove duplication as much as possible. However, the db related things are the most sensitive, since people have management application relying on certain structure.
Is having a common database layout an objective of the sip-router project?
Yes, but I would say it will be the last to happen -- there will be quite some debates around.
If I intent to implement to additionnal event package, do you advise me to stick with kamailio subscriber layout?
presence and subscriber profiles are quite independent.
I finally understood why my "make deb" was compiling a ser version: I just forgot to checkout the kamailio branch... That was also a source of confusion for understanding why normal step for the kamailio branch was to setup a ser database layout... Because of that error, I though first the same layout was already used...
A bit inconvenient with git, indeed, but I could not find how to fetch easily only the branch to give such guidelines.
Cheers, Daniel
Tks, Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP amsip - http://www.antisip.com osip2 - http://www.osip.org eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
regards klaus
Tks much for your help & advise,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP amsip - http://www.antisip.com osip2 - http://www.osip.org eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev