Hello,
indeed, in the source code t_reply() throws an error if used from branch route, but sl_send_reply() is fine. Given that send_reply() is a wrapper around the two, the code needs to be reviewed to see why t_reply() is not allowed in branch route and find a solution for it.
Cheers, Daniel
On 10/14/13 7:52 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
according to sl readme, send_reply() can be called from branch route. however, when i tried with recent master i got:
Oct 14 08:47:34 rautu /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[11203]: : tm [tm.c:1342]: w_t_reply(): BUG: w_t_reply entered in unsupported mode Oct 14 08:47:34 rautu /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[11203]: ERROR: sl [sl.c:277]: send_reply(): failed to reply stateful (tm)
is this a bug in code or readme?
-- juha
sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev