Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
I wanted to narrow where the issue is, because the description didn't mentioned db-only mode, which I think support for it was added later for execution of event route. If it would have been also for in-memory records modes, the impact could have been larger on other features.
Given that it was discovered for db-only, the PR can be merged.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.