[sr-dev] Re: [kamailio/kamailio] cdp: fixed issues discovered during static code analysis (PR #4030)

@vingarzan commented on this pull request. int seed; peer *p; - seed = random(); + seed = kam_rand(); Do we need though cryptographically secure seeding of the random though? I looked now in core/pt.c and there seem to be 3 things seeded there... I'd say that, if all 3 should be seeded after forking, then we should extract that code as a function, maybe even have a Kamailio-fork-function to do all of these. Anyway, this PR only tries to fight the immediate fires, not do such deeper changes. It looks like the old code here is only seeding the child processes. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4030#discussion_r1848411797 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/4030/review/2445551931(a)github.com>