Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
I do not think every utility has to be renamed. Anyhow there are kamctl and serctl that do different things and they have to be kept.
i'm not asking renaming of all utilities. in fact, i'm not asking to rename any, but a POSSIBILITY to configure the name of serctl that deals with core and should thus be independent from ser or kamailio.
Also rtpproxy was in the cvs repository as a related project, so keeping this kind of related tools with different names should be fine. Related are also serweb, sems, etc ... sticking to current name is better imo.
all those you list are not mandatory for managing of the core like serctl is and i don't care how they are named. if you want to stick to ser ralated name of serctl, then do so, but don't force everyone else to do the same.
-- juha