1 Jul
2009
1 Jul
'09
8:50 p.m.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
I do not think every utility has to be renamed. Anyhow
there are kamctl
and serctl that do different things and they have to be kept.
i'm not asking renaming of all utilities. in fact, i'm not asking to
rename any, but a POSSIBILITY to configure the name of serctl that deals
with core and should thus be independent from ser or kamailio.
Also
rtpproxy was in the cvs repository as a related project, so keeping this
kind of related tools with different names should be fine. Related are
also serweb, sems, etc ... sticking to current name is better imo.
all those you list are not mandatory for managing of the core like
serctl is and i don't care how they are named. if you want to stick to
ser ralated name of serctl, then do so, but don't force everyone else
to do the same.
-- juha