8 Mar
2011
8 Mar
'11
3:15 p.m.
On Tuesday 08 March 2011, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
indeed it was not something complex, it is why I
thought it worth doing.
However,my idea was slightly different to use a parameter for
allow_trusted(), so you can have many calls of the function with
different behaviour.
I looked at that option and I'm all for it (there are already enough functions
dependent on 'global' parameters), but there are already 2 allow_trusted
functions for 0 or 2 parameters. Adding another (1st or 3rd) optional
parameter to those would make a complete mess of it, requiring 4
implementations and forwarding the option through a series of functions.
Making them non-optional would not be backwards compatible, which was the
whole purpose of making it configurable.
--
Greetings,
Alex Hermann