Is this fix this issue too?
[#2404
(
comment)](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2404#issuecomment-661…)
when used
```
bind_ipv6_link_local=0
```
I am not sure. The whole identification code is too convoluted for a casual analysis. If
you can apply and test, we'll get the answer back.
As I said, this whole part will benefit from a rewrite. It'll be smaller, easier to
analyze, more efficient and less error prone - for example, right now it's performing
almost the same exchange with netlink twice and it can't handle dropped netlink
messages.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2595#issuecomment-754183712