Based on your description above, it seems you are right. I didn't have the time for proper analysis of the code, but at a quick look, there are many places where memory allocation is done with -1, maybe that should be removed in all those places.

Did you test by removing the -1 and it worked as expected?


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.