Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
Have you start it with -x qm or without?
From the core of the next bt, can you get:
frame 0 p *t p *p_msg info locals
when i start k with -x qm, i have not managed to get a crash. however, if i start k without -x qm, it crashes reliably, for example:
(gdb) where #0 0x0000000000641acc in fm_extract_free (qm=0x7f28c8dd4000, frag=0x7f28c958e4a0) at mem/f_malloc.c:181 #1 0x0000000000643689 in fm_join_frag (qm=0x7f28c8dd4000, f=0x7f28c958e468) at mem/f_malloc.c:556 #2 0x00000000006445ac in fm_free (qmp=0x7f28c8dd4000, p=0x7f28c958e4a0, file=0x7f28ce687f1d "tm: h_table.c", func=0x7f28ce6881bb <__FUNCTION__.9593> "free_cell", line=162) at mem/f_malloc.c:624 #3 0x00007f28ce5c1c12 in free_cell (dead_cell=0x7f28c95eb6c0) at h_table.c:162 #4 0x00007f28ce64449e in wait_handler (ti=1463515017, wait_tl=0x7f28c95eb740, data=0x7f28c95eb6c0) at timer.c:648 #5 0x00000000004aaf88 in timer_list_expire (t=1463515017, h=0x7f28c8e21360, slow_l=0x7f28c8e21e38, slow_mark=153) at timer.c:873 #6 0x00000000004ab3e5 in timer_handler () at timer.c:938 #7 0x00000000004ab853 in timer_main () at timer.c:977 #8 0x000000000052f690 in main_loop () at main.c:1650 #9 0x00000000005354e8 in main (argc=17, argv=0x7ffcfb5ef7a8) at main.c:2566
-- juha