23 Sep
2015
23 Sep
'15
11:15 a.m.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
Have you start it with -x qm or without?
when i start k with -x qm, i have not managed to get a crash. however,
if i start k without -x qm, it crashes reliably, for example:
(gdb) where
#0 0x0000000000641acc in fm_extract_free (qm=0x7f28c8dd4000,
frag=0x7f28c958e4a0) at mem/f_malloc.c:181
#1 0x0000000000643689 in fm_join_frag (qm=0x7f28c8dd4000, f=0x7f28c958e468)
at mem/f_malloc.c:556
#2 0x00000000006445ac in fm_free (qmp=0x7f28c8dd4000, p=0x7f28c958e4a0,
file=0x7f28ce687f1d "tm: h_table.c",
func=0x7f28ce6881bb <__FUNCTION__.9593> "free_cell", line=162)
at mem/f_malloc.c:624
#3 0x00007f28ce5c1c12 in free_cell (dead_cell=0x7f28c95eb6c0) at h_table.c:162
#4 0x00007f28ce64449e in wait_handler (ti=1463515017, wait_tl=0x7f28c95eb740,
data=0x7f28c95eb6c0) at timer.c:648
#5 0x00000000004aaf88 in timer_list_expire (t=1463515017, h=0x7f28c8e21360,
slow_l=0x7f28c8e21e38, slow_mark=153) at timer.c:873
#6 0x00000000004ab3e5 in timer_handler () at timer.c:938
#7 0x00000000004ab853 in timer_main () at timer.c:977
#8 0x000000000052f690 in main_loop () at main.c:1650
#9 0x00000000005354e8 in main (argc=17, argv=0x7ffcfb5ef7a8) at main.c:2566
-- juha
From the core of the next bt, can you get:
frame 0
p *t
p *p_msg
info locals