10 Sep
2009
10 Sep
'09
7:36 p.m.
Hi Andrei,
Thank you for this detailed answer.
Indeed, update to 0.9.7 will be more easier than SER 2.0. Our priority
is to avoid a lot of bugs.
We are not able to reproduce the crash...so we'll see. Probably we will
do an update to 0.9.7.
Regards,
Adrien
Le mercredi 09 septembre 2009 à 13:11 +0200, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul a
écrit :
On Sep 04, 2009 at 18:06, inge <inge(a)legos.fr>
wrote:
Hello Andrei,
I wonder what is involved in migration to SER 2.0 versus 0.9.5. I read
that UID is used now to identify the users instead of username for
example, so we can anticipate impacts on internal processes and SERWeb.
Yes, uid and did (for domains) are now used internally.
There is a script which might help in migrating a database:
http://www.iptel.org/ser/migrate_db
Can I find a detailed list which these changelog ?
Try
http://www.iptel.org/basic_changes_in_configuration_file_0
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=ser;a=blob;f=ser/NEWS;h=0254…
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=ser;a=blob;f=ser/ChangeLog;h…
I don't remember exactly, hopefully there is a more complete migration
guide somewhere (maybe somebody else can help if I missed anything).
Is it not more reasonnable to migrate in 0.9.7? Mainly to solve our
initial bug with Seg Fault and optionnaly to have new features.
Yes, in your case migration to 0.9.7 should be painless (there are no
config or db changes, only bugfixes, so you wouldn't need to change
anything).
Andrei