7 Nov
2009
7 Nov
'09
4:10 a.m.
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul schrieb:
Why not make STUN=1 default?
klaus
On Nov 06, 2009 at 14:39, I?aki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net> wrote:
> El Viernes, 6 de Noviembre de 2009, Klaus Darilion escribi?:
> 1.
client:
> The client learns the public socket during REGISTER (Via received+rport
> in response) and changes its contact in REGISTER
Even better would for the client to use STUN over tcp first to find the
port and NAT address and then send the REGISTER with the proper ports
(on the same connections). Then it could use STUN for keepalives
(draft-ietf-behave-rfc3489bis).
(in this case sr must be configured with STUN support, e.g.
make config STUN=1)