30 Jan
2017
30 Jan
'17
2:51 p.m.
Thinking it better, wouldn't moving the flag reset at the end of t_continue
make the check in t_reply useless?
I have to admit that I don't fully understand that check anyway :)
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Federico Cabiddu <notifications(a)github.com>
wrote:
You're right, I'll try this 2nd approach.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
notifications(a)github.com> wrote:
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/955#issuecomment-276049555>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF36ZYAsvBRJ6KyaWuVm-Jg6pmA9CZoIks5rXdXKgaJpZM4LwvBV>
.
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
Unless you think it should be better to be reset
when t_continue() is
finished instead of inside t_suspend(), you can merge it.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/955#issuecomment-276049199>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADip4-
uUCfyyOtIztbsfOXue3BnqzQh_ks5rXdVHgaJpZM4LwvBV>
.