Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
It was not backported beacuse it was not clear for me if it goes more towards an enhancement (feature). The docs say the event route is executed for local requests that creates a transaction, however, CANCEL is associated with an INVITE transaction, it is never with a standalone purpose. It was also mentioned that it was for the case of CANCEL generated via RPC.
Overall I am not against backporting if it is considered more a bug than an enhancement, I just wanted to be sure it doesn't break expecting behaviour in a minor release. It was an email last week when the commits were backported to review if anything was missed.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.