11 May
2010
11 May
'10
2:54 p.m.
On 5/10/10 3:23 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
i tried with
sercmd mi address_reload
mi_addr_child_init() initializes db_handle, which i think is not
necessary now when reload_address_table does the same and checks that
the handle is not initialized. perhaps mi_addr_child_init() could be
deleted?
I think the error is that mi_rpc does not initialize the MI process
created by ctl module. So you fixed for address reload but there are
other modules in same situation. I will look deeper at it and fix it.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
* http://www.asipto.com/
* http://twitter.com/miconda
* http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielconstantinmierla
modules_k/permissions: fixed reloading of address table
- Database handle was not initialized when address table was reloaded.
Now it is initialized/closed at each reload. Looks like this has
never been tested before. Still don't know why mi_addr_child_init()
exists and what it is supposed to do.
are you using the command via MI transports or over RPC?