Hi,
Great, thanks Timo.
We're going to go ahead and see what we can come up with. We are initially thinking of building a new module from scratch, obv. with a lot of reuse from the original dialog module. Our goal then is to get all the correct data structures in place (in and out tables, etc) and being built up correctly using a state machine. Once we're are there we will create a branch for everyone else to help and provide feedback.
We will def. need help when it comes to termination of early dialog, etc - but I think we will get a very good start in.
Cheers
JasonOn Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Timo Reimann <timo.reimann@1und1.de> wrote:
On 07.09.2011 11:22, Timo Reimann wrote:One more comment: If the new implementation gives you an opportunity to
> If you find more points to discuss, I (and Iņaki and others possibly
> too) would be glad to share in. In addition, I think that opening up
> another branch for the new dialog module at a rather early stage of
> development might be a good idea in order to get more eyes on the code.
redo the reference counting portion of the module, I suggest to take it.
Reference counting management has grown into the most complicated part
of the module, and thus can surely benefit from a new, fresh approach.
--Timo
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev