Re: [sr-dev] Fwd: [OpenIMSCore-CSCF] About my "carstenbock/ims" branch on the sip-router.org GIT repository

Hi Carsten, in light of Daniel's response maybe we should join forces? how would you feel about me contributing the effort you are putting into openims and sr3? btw, I have already written a module for the Ro interface. What I wanted to do next was to incorp. code into the dialog module to be able to support online charging through the Ro interface. thoughts? Cheers jason On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > On 4/5/11 1:35 PM, Carsten Bock wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I will simply forward this question... >> I would suppose to put it somewhere at the Kamailio SVN for 1.5? > 1.5 is no longer maintained officially, just backports by developers > that > still use it -- which may happen down to 0.9 -- but no new features. > > Personally I would prefer to go only with one IMS extensions > integration, > based on current development branch (git master). Besides the fact that > joining forces will make things move forward faster, having two > directions > for same thing (one within very old branch) will confuse people a lot. > Maybe > Jason will consider trying 3.1.x and we can try removing his doubts > about > this version when he has specific questions about what he does not > trust. > > I strongly think this is the best at this moment, there is already > confusion with duplicated modules coming from kamailio and ser, > creating a > new development branch based on 1.5 will confuse even more. We are > working > to remove duplicated, thus remove confusion, and we should go only in > this > direction if we want to finish it soon. > > Now regarding the trust of 3.x, I can say that 3.1.x is far more better > than 1.5. In 1.x one could barely use tcp or tls, the tm module had > some > potential races which couldn't be handled without a major > refurbishment. > That happened in 3.x - if one search the recent archive, there were > crashes > reported to 1.5 rather than to 3.1. > > If one does not like the mix of kamailio and ser modules, then just > ignore > the modules_s/* for a while and you are set. Installing kamailio from > packages take care of that and only kamailio modules are installed > (modules/* and modules_k/*). AFAIK, the openimscore developers are > working > also with 3.x so future code from them will just work on latest version > of > our project. > > Cheers, > Daniel > >> Carsten >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Jason Penton<jason.penton(a)gmail.com> >> Date: 2011/4/5 >> Subject: Re: [OpenIMSCore-CSCF] About my "carstenbock/ims" branch on >> the sip-router.org GIT repository >> To: Carsten Bock<carsten(a)ng-voice.com> >> Cc: openimscore-cscf(a)lists.berlios.de >> >> >> Hey Carsten, >> Right now I am doing something similar, but rather with >> kamailio-1.5.5. I have not migrated to SR yet and dont intend to >> anytime soon. Right now I have ported CDP, CDP_AVP, and ICSCF and they >> are running. >> My reason is that I don't quite 'trust' sr2 just yet - and I'm not >> sure I like the mix and match of ser and kamailio modules - anyway a >> discussion probably already discussed and not for this thread. I'd be >> happy to put a 1.5.5 version up somewhere that everyone could use? >> what do you suggest? >> Cheers >> Jason >> >> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Carsten Bock<carsten(a)ng-voice.com> >> wrote: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> i just wanted to notice, that i am actually working on re-integrating >>> the OpenIMS-core into the sip-router.org/Kamailio project. >>> It is not a fork of the official OpenIMSCore project, but more a >>> merge >>> of the OpenIMScore Project into the Kamailio/sip-router.org project. >>> >>> As a first step, i've made all the CSCF modules compile and work with >>> a current Kamailio source. In order to do this, only minor adaptions >>> were required. >>> >>> As a second step, i am working on a better integration into the >>> existing structures of the Kamailio project; i want to achieve the >>> following things: >>> - replace integrated dialog awareness of the CSCF modules with >>> Kamailio's dialog module >>> - replcae integrated registrar of the CSCF modules with Kamailio's >>> registrar module >>> - replace integrated nathelper support with the sip-router.org >>> nathelper/rtpproxy moduels >>> - replcae integrated RFC 3680 support with Kamailio's >>> Presence/Presence-User-Agent modules >>> - add documentation in accordance with the other sip-router.org >>> modules >>> >>> I've already changed quite a few things in the Kamailio core, in >>> order >>> to achieve this: K's dialog module is now able to store additional >>> data to a dialog (works great), K's usrloc/registrar module is able >>> to >>> store additional information to an contact (still buggy) and i have >>> already added support for RFC 3680 to Kamailio's presence/pua >>> infrastructure (when you register, the system will "PUBLISH" the >>> registration state; another system may already "SUBSCRIBE" to the >>> status and "NOTIFY" requests are already parsed (but not stored >>> yet)). >>> So it is going on. I have also already modified some of the config to >>> use generic append_hf() and remove_hf() functions instead of custom >>> implemented functions... >>> >>> The progress is slow but steady since i work on it apart from my >>> regular work. I try to publish any new developments on this on my >>> blog/homepage (www.ng-voice.com), where you may also find some more >>> information about the installation and the components of the project >>> (i provide a repository of the last step for easy installation). >>> >>> I started implementing an own HSS some time ago (openhss.org), but >>> the >>> development on this currently stopped. First, i do not have enough >>> time to work on both the Kamailio integration, regular work and the >>> HSS; second the main developer on the HSS (Brian) just resigned due >>> to >>> health reasons. >>> >>> Some of you may have noticed, that i am working for Telefonica in >>> Germany as a regular work. I am working on the Class 4/5 >>> infrastructure at Telefonica and we have already implemented an >>> Ericsson IMS core. However, i wanted to mention, that neither >>> Telefonica nor O2 is behind this project. The only support i get from >>> Telefonica is, that i get a monthly salary and that i may use some >>> time to work on the OpenIMS-project during normal office-hours (as >>> time allows). >>> If i do things, i do it by heart and not half-hearted... that >>> probably >>> explains a lot of the effort spent on the project. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Carsten >>> >>> -- >>> Carsten Bock >>> http://www.ng-voice.com >>> mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com >>> >>> Schomburgstr. 80 >>> 22767 Hamburg >>> Germany >>> >>> Mobile +49 179 2021244 >>> Office +49 40 34927219 >>> Fax +49 40 34927220 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenIMSCore-CSCF mailing list >>> OpenIMSCore-CSCF(a)lists.berlios.de >>> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openimscore-cscf >> >> > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla > http://www.asipto.com >