24 Apr
2009
24 Apr
'09
5:42 p.m.
Miklos Tirpak writes:
I vote fore keeping the support for "if
(@to.tag)" like expressions, and
adding the extra functions for more precise checks if necessary. So a
string value could evaluate to true if it exists and not "".
what if there is no to tag at all or if there is one, but its value is
""?
I think it is easier to read and understand "if
(@to.tag)" then "if
(!strempty((a)to.tag))"
why don't you write 'if (@to.tag != "") ...'? that would be easy
to
understand.
-- juha