[sr-dev] Nat_traversal module + RFC6598

Hello All, Any objections if I update nat_traversal module to include CGN address space, similar to the patch submitted for nathelper module (with the correct address range)? Or does someone else have it in mind to do it? Regards, Charles -- www.sipcentric.com Follow us on twitter @sipcentric <http://twitter.com/sipcentric> Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592. Registered office: Unit 10 iBIC, Birmingham Science Park, Holt Court South, Birmingham B7 4EJ.