7 Jan
2013
7 Jan
'13
3:34 p.m.
Hi Richard,
I haven't been directly involved with the coding of the registrar stuff.
This does sound like testing worth doing.
Also worth adding tests to check that if you get a 430 back after
routing to one reg-id you can try the next.
Peter
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 12:54 +0000, Richard Brady wrote:
Hi Peter
Great work on this! We'd like to help you test.
The test I have in mind, which we could create using SIPp, would be to
register multiple contacts with the same instance-id (i.e.
"sip.instance" param) but different reg-id params. Then send an INVITE
to that AoR and make sure the forking is only per instance-id and not
per reg-id. This could be repeated in multiple permutations of
instance-ids and reg-ids.
This would be a test of save() and lookup() more than anything else.
Is that what you had in mind?
Richard
On 3 January 2013 14:13, Peter Dunkley
<peter.dunkley(a)crocodile-rcs.com> wrote:
I hope to get the outbound edge proxy and flow timer stuff
into master by Monday, but it could really do with some
additional testing especially in conjunction with the reg-id
stuff in registrar/usrloc (which I have no idea how to use).
Peter
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Peter Dunkley
Technical Director
Crocodile RCS Ltd