6 Aug
2009
6 Aug
'09
6:25 p.m.
Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
2009/8/6 Klaus Darilion
<klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at>at>:
Well, I can't agree. A SIP proxy shouldn't implement a HTTP URI in a
request, or a mailto URI, even if RFC 3261 says "any URI".
AFAIK the only URI's to implement wouuld be:
- SIP
- SIPS
- TEL
- URN
IMO this is a little bit short-sighted. You never know which knid of new
URIs we have in 3 years.
It would be great if we do not have to patch sr for every new URI schema
- having support for "absolute-URI" would allow to just handle the URI
to an external application (exec, http, DB-query, radius ..whatever) and
do the routing for the next hop.
regaeds
Klaus
At the
same time, we could implement support for other URI's, like XMPP
since we have an xmpp gateway.
Yes, should be generic as RFC 3261 which allows all
kind of URIs