17 Apr
2010
17 Apr
'10
2:54 p.m.
2010/4/17 Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com>om>:
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
Yes, it makes sense, failure_route should not be entered if no
transaction took place (due TCP connection error, malformed message,
invalid destination).
So I wonder, shouldn't be better if we forgot
the t_relay() codes and
instead handle the error of the winning branch (even if it failed or
it was no branch) in failure_route?
inaki,
this has been discussed before and then the response has been that it is
impossible to enter failure route if transaction has not been created. so there has not been any other choice that to live
with this terrible
mess.
ok :(
Thanks for your response.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>