6 Jul
2011
6 Jul
'11
10:56 a.m.
Am 05.07.2011 19:04, schrieb Iñaki Baz Castillo:
2011/7/5 Jan Janak <jan(a)ryngle.com>om>:
I just wonder why it is deprecated at all? IIRC "sips:" does not mandate
any protocol, just that encryption must be used. Thus, plain TCP over
IPsec would also fulfill "sips:", but for sure is different than TLS+TCP.
regards
Klaus
> So what is the difference then? How is a
Route header with sips scheme
> different from a Route header with the transport=tls parameter? Is the
> proxy server supposed to treat Route headers with sips differently
> than Route headers with sip;transport=tls?
No, the only difference is that
transport=tls is deprecated and
""""maybe"""" some devices don't understand
;transport=tls.