12 Apr
2011
12 Apr
'11
6:45 p.m.
I'm sorry, attachment forgotten...
ciao
francesco
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Francesco Castellano
<francesco.castellano(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
thank you for the kind reply.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
Indeed I'm just use a plain linux debian squeeze x86_64. It is a
xen-hosted vm with not so much memory (256 MB + swap of 512 MB).
By the stderr of "kamailio -ddddc", it seems that no db_url parameter
is defined for acc.so (in attachment those lines with db_url or acc).
Just to provide more informations, I said that db_url was the valid
db_url used for other modules, because, after the segfault, I got the
corefile and, backtracing with gdb, at acc_onreply(), printing db_flag
I got 0, and printing db_url I got
"mysql://kamailio:kamailiorw@localhost/kamailio". Now I'm not really
an expert of gdb, so I'm not sure at all that the procedure followed
was the correct one to have printed the db_url value of acc.so. Please
correct me if I'm wrong.
Kind regards,
Francesco Castellano
Finally,
and more importantly, do you have any idea about the reason
for which the config parser can see a default value for db_url (for
acc), different from the one in modules_k/acc/acc_mod.c (specifically,
it takes a valid db_url used by other modules)?
What operating system are you using? Normally should not be a symbol
conflict and the value of the db url in acc module should be the one set
locally - so far it was not reported any such conflict although the acc
module is very old.