On Wednesday 24 June 2009 15:22:50 Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 06/24/2009 04:01 PM, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:
On Wednesday 24 June 2009 14:49:37 Juha Heinanen wrote:
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:
We still have the problem that we haven't decided yet on a short-name. (while the project is called sip-router, we haven't decided on the short binary name). Unfortunately this is proving to be very difficult since there are a lot of very different opinions (we tried once before and we gave up after 2 days because there was no agreement in sight).
my proposal is to call binary/config file sip-router/sip-router.cfg. sr would be too short. tools, like ctl, could be prefixed with sr.
I like this proposal, look simple and clear.
This is very bad from project identity point of view. I have been few weeks ago at a conference in Germany and telling people that I present sip router, everyone asked "which one?" It really looks ridiculous to say something like " I manufacture a car named 'car' " (or "I develop a sip router name sip router").
Therefore, if matters, there should be some other identifier for the project to make it easy to refer to others.
Cheers, Daniel
Hi Daniel, I was just speaking about the binary/config name, not the project name.
I supposed that if sip-router is been used as project name from the beginning, chaning it now could be dangerous ... another project name change in less than a year ? ... buff I don't see it