Re: [sr-dev] more fixups in mod_fix.h or what?

Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:

mod_fix.h should be used if there are more than one module using that fixup, otherwise makes no sense, the fixup should stay in the module.

Using type of parameter in name of function does not scale anymore, so a different name pattern should be chosen. Can be developer choice, preferably suggestive if possible.

how about a new scheme, where in exports module writer lists the fixups in an arg string, for example,

{"test", (cmd_function)test, "pvar,str,spve", REQUEST_ROUTE | FAILURE_ROUTE},

names in the arg string can be well known (in which case nothing else needs to be done by module writer) or custom (in which case the corresponding fixup needs to be written by module writer).

-- juha