6 Oct
2009
6 Oct
'09
3:01 a.m.
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
After reading: Isn't fr_timer corresponding to timer B and fr_inv_timer
to C? Which actually would mean that you shouldn't mess with fr_timer
and keep it at 32 seconds and are free to mess with fr_inv_timer but
make it reasonably big?
On Oct 05, 2009 at 17:12, Martin Hoffmann
<martin.hoffmann(a)telio.ch> wrote:
Er, yes. Of course.
Similarly, fr_timer indicates the time after
which resending of a
2xx response upstream will cease, if no ACK has been received.
^^^^
negative response to an invite
(it has nothing to do with 2xx/ACK which are end-to-end, but with
negative replies replies for INV and ACK) But if it gets
split, rather use nr_inv_timer and fr_inv_timer or
somesuch, to make it a bit more telling. Or use, what is it? A and C?
There is not a 1:1 mapping between the RFC timers and the tm timers.
According to the RFC we should use only fr_inv_timer all the time for
INVITEs :-) (so no fast failover, voicemail a.s.o) See also https://sip-router.org/wiki/ref_manual/timers
, which is a more
complete description, including corresponding RFC timer names.
See? ;)
Regards,
Martin