Hi Daniel,
thank you for the reply. Yes, I also thought about the return value of the t_relay(). Will give it a try for this scenario.
Thanks for the hint regarding disabling the internal reply.
Cheers,
Henning
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, November 27, 2020 2:08 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>; Henning Westerholt <hw@skalatan.de>
Cc: Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List <sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] handling of locally generated 478 errors
On 27.11.20 14:05, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
you should be able to disable sending internal replies inside tm in case of t_relay() failure with:
* https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_set_disable_internal_reply
The to handling in the IF branch of t_relay() execution if it returns false. There is no need to use event_route from sl module in this case.
^^^ above, somehow, parts got removed, was supposed to be:
Then do error handling in the ...
Cheers,
DanielOn 27.11.20 09:41, Henning Westerholt wrote:
Hello,
any comment on this topic? Would be great to get an opinion at least on the first question, then I could document it or open an issue for it.
Thanks,
Henning
From: Henning Westerholt
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2020 6:53 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Cc: Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List <sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: handling of locally generated 478 errors
Hello,
I want to ask for your opinion on the best approach regarding the handling of locally generated 478 errors.
To give an example, like the ones generated from TM during t_relay() on an unresolvable destination.
Nov 25 17:40:13 kamailio[19345]: ERROR: {28607414 INVITE bba500ac-a9df-1239-6693-00505682c04d} tm [ut.h:286]: uri2dst2(): failed to resolve "invalid.skalatan.de" :unresolvable A or AAAA request (-7)
Nov 25 17:40:13 kamailio[19345]: ERROR: {28607414 INVITE bba500ac-a9df-1239-6693-00505682c04d} tm [t_fwd.c:1738]: t_forward_nonack(): failure to add branches
Nov 25 17:40:13 kamailio[19345]: CRITICAL: {28607414 INVITE bba500ac-a9df-1239-6693-00505682c04d} rtpengine [../../core/parser/../ip_addr.h:658]: ip_addr2sbuf(): unknown address family 0
These errors will not show up in onreply or failure_route. A long time ago this was discussed on the list [1], as some functionality were phased out out that support these scenarios.
Kamailio will try to generate a 478 with TM, this will obviously fail as well, and then generate a 478 with SL.
Question 1)
Is this intentional that the internally generated 478 is not showing up in the failure_route, like for for 408? This has been tested several times, but it is a complicated configuration.
Question 2)
Are there any other (better) ideas how to handle that besides using a “event_route[sl:local-response]” to catch this, e.g. to tear down otherwise stale rtpengine sessions etc..? As a side note, event_route[tm:local-response] seems not to work as well because of the tm failure.
Thanks,
Henning
[1] https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2011-June/069020.html
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com
_______________________________________________Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users--Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/micondaFunding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla