22 Sep
2010
22 Sep
'10
6:09 a.m.
There is no other more user friendly procedure for the 200ok/ACK SDP
negotiation.
The existence of SDP in the initial INVITE must be checked.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net> wrote:
2010/9/21 Ovidiu Sas <osas(a)voipembedded.com>om>:
Why?
- force_rtp_proxy no longer support 200ok/ACK SDP negotiation ('s'
flag was deprecated);
Hi, in case of "200/ACK SDP" rtpproxy_offer should be called in the
183/200 and rtpproxy_answer in the ACK, and for that the existance of
a SDP body should be inspected in the initial INVITE, am I right? or
is there a more user-friendly way to achieve this case?
Thanks.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>