7 Apr
2014
7 Apr
'14
3:15 p.m.
Richard Fuchs writes:
Yes I understand, but there's still a few different options to consider in this case.
Should it always add itself as relay candidate? Or only if there are other ICE candidates already present?
in my opinion, always, and there should be option to replace existing ones.
Should it still replace the endpoint info in m= and c= lines? Or only if it adds itself as host candidate?
i'm not sure about that because i don't know ice well enough. if both parties support ice, do they care what is on those lines or do they only look at candidate ips/ports? if they don't care, then i guess it is ok to replace endpoint info on c and m lines. perhaps someone who knows ice well can comment.
-- juha