3 Feb
2016
3 Feb
'16
12:33 p.m.
On 03 Feb 2016, at 11:10, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I would try to keep http prefix for all the functions that do not
overlap. I expect the functions from utils modules will be moved to one
of the new http client modules in the future, given the better framework
provided by these ones.
I already have a copy of that function, which was the base
I started from.
I asked about deleting the function in utils on the mailing list earlier, but Juha
wasn’t positive to that idea so I let it go and changed the name in the curl
module.
For the ones that overlap and don't provide (or target) the same
functionality, then maybe something new can be found.
For the ones that overlap in functionality and target, until the old
ones get merged, then we can use some other prefix, but I think http
should be full in there, maybe http_curl_ or httpc_ -- again, in the
plan should be merging the functions from utils into these ones in the
near future, ending up in having full set of cunctions prefixed with http_.
I would
like that.
/O
Cheers,
Daniel
On 03/02/16 10:56, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
I am about to rename functions with the “curl”
prefix as well as the connection defintions.
Since the old function in utils use “http” as a prefix we need something else.
“http_client” seems too long
“hc” and “hac” for sync and async functions may work. “httpcon” instead of “curlcon”.
Any better ideas?
/O
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com
http://miconda.eu
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev