22 Sep
2009
22 Sep
'09
3:49 p.m.
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:
Right now, we have tm.t_uac_wait, which should behave
like t_uac_dlg
(there are some output differences, but we can have another version with
whatever output format is needed) and it works "async" on xmlrpc.
There is no support for mi_rpc async, but is it really needed? Is there
another async mi command ?(even if it is, it might be easier to re-write
it in terms of rpc then try to make mi_rpc translate also the mi async
callback to rpc).
andrei,
for me xmlrpc transport is enough for tm.t_uac_wait. i thought to test
it today, but cannot find documentation about its parameters. would it
be possible to add the t_uac_wait to tm README?
-- juha