@rfuchs requested changes on this pull request.
@@ -2529,6 +2551,7 @@ static bencode_item_t
*rtpp_function_call(bencode_buffer_t *bencbuf, struct sip_
body.s = NULL;
ng_flags.flags = bencode_list(bencbuf);
+ ng_flags.received-from = bencode_list(bencbuf);
Typo here (dash instead of underscore). Maybe at least try to compile it before
submitting?
@@ -2649,13 +2672,18 @@ static bencode_item_t
*rtpp_function_call(bencode_buffer_t *bencbuf, struct sip_
bencode_dictionary_add_str(ng_flags.dict, "via-branch", &viabranch);
}
- item = bencode_list(bencbuf);
- bencode_dictionary_add(ng_flags.dict, "received-from", item);
- bencode_list_add_string(item, (msg->rcv.src_ip.af == AF_INET) ? "IP4" : (
- (msg->rcv.src_ip.af == AF_INET6) ? "IP6" :
- "?"
- ) );
- bencode_list_add_string(item, ip_addr2a(&msg->rcv.src_ip));
+ if (ng_flags.received_from && ng_flags.received_from->child) {
+ bencode_dictionary_add(ng_flags.dict, "received-from",
ng_flags.received_from);
+ }
+ else {
+ item = bencode_list(bencbuf);
Just a suggestion, but you could reuse `ng_flags.received_from` here instead of creating a
new list item. But up to you.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3230#pullrequestreview-1099086127
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3230/review/1099086127(a)github.com>