20 okt 2009 kl. 20.12 skrev Jan Janak:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Olle E. Johansson
<oej(a)edvina.net>
wrote:
...talks about a new FIFO command. I am changing
that to rpc - right?
Maybe "a new management command" would be even better for
documentation, that wording is not tied to any particular interface or
technology.
If I understood Andrei, rpc is the core interface, xmlrpc, binrpc and
others
are just the various interfaces on top of this.
But I do agree, using "rpc" is confusing. And "new" doesn't apply
in
this
file any more. I think naming the section "management interface" or
"management commands" is a good choice.
What will the replacement of this example be:
serctl fifo flat_rotate
Currently "sercmd flatstore.rotate", but the change of the tool might
change in the future, but don't worry about that now.
sercmd is defined in our dictionary, so that won't be a problem. When
we change that, all docs will be updated. The power of docbook, you
know :-)
/O