20 okt 2009 kl. 20.12 skrev Jan Janak:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Olle E. Johansson oej@edvina.net wrote:
...talks about a new FIFO command. I am changing that to rpc - right?
Maybe "a new management command" would be even better for documentation, that wording is not tied to any particular interface or technology.
If I understood Andrei, rpc is the core interface, xmlrpc, binrpc and others are just the various interfaces on top of this. But I do agree, using "rpc" is confusing. And "new" doesn't apply in this file any more. I think naming the section "management interface" or "management commands" is a good choice.
What will the replacement of this example be:
serctl fifo flat_rotate
Currently "sercmd flatstore.rotate", but the change of the tool might change in the future, but don't worry about that now.
sercmd is defined in our dictionary, so that won't be a problem. When we change that, all docs will be updated. The power of docbook, you know :-)
/O