17 Oct
2009
17 Oct
'09
3:14 p.m.
Jan Janak writes:
Ohh, I see. I did not get that from the documentation
and the code.
So, if I understand it correctly, what you are saying is that
fr_inv_timer_next is used if serial forking takes place and in that
case it is used for all branches except those that are tried last. The
last set of parallel branches in serial forking uses the usual
fr_inv_timer.
you did understand correctly.
I think we might need to clear this up a little in the
readme because
I did not understand it from the documentation. In fact, I was
wondering why t_next_contacts resets the timer to fr_inv_timeout at
the end and it makes sense now. Thanks.
feel free to try to make it more clear in the readme. it is said there,
but may be not very well.
-- juha