1 Jul
2009
1 Jul
'09
9:17 p.m.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
btw, I forgot to mention, if by asking a possibility
to configure the
name for binary, tools, etc. you mean that you will implement and submit
a patch when it is the case, that is very fine, improvements are welcome
always.
of course i would commit the changes needed that allow easy
configuration of the name for serctl command.
What I wanted to say is that I do not want replacing
defaults with other
static names now. And I won't put efforts in such things before we get
to testing phase for new relase.
i have not proposed to change any defaults.
-- juha