19 Nov
2021
19 Nov
'21
7:21 a.m.
Thanks for the pull request. I am not 100% sure if this approach is the right one. * in line 83 the lock is allocated, sure * the while loop basically has two exit conditions * there are no free SPIs - first unlock, line 109 * a free SPI was found - second unlock, line 121
Your pull request changes this logic to unconditionally unlock, and then do a second unlock again, if I am not wrong?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2941#issuecomment-973817111