@miconda i'm not proposing "default random list of stored attributes", i was proposing a known value that is compatible with 5.3 if it was implemented by addinginstead of skipping.
but as i said before, i'm not blocking this in any way, just concerned about memory footprint from one version to another as a principle, tho in this is case, it adds almost none

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.