On Dec 16, 2008 at 15:33, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/16/08 15:27, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Dec 16, 2008 at 15:02, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello,
I couldn't get the message with a final decision regarding the library
naming scheme.
Andrei used libsr_xyz at some point, I also like this one. Henning
committed directly lib/trie in his branch.
It looks like most people prefer libsrxyz (without '_'). At least
everybody agreed with libsrdb1 and libsrdb2.
ok, and for sub-directories in lib/, should use srxyz? I am not sure now
someone will use these libs for development of other applications
In general they can't be used outside sr, unless you are very carefully
not to depend on anything from the core (e.g. mallocs).
I don't see any advantage in using either srxyz or xyz, so I don't think
we should enforce it.
Do we vote or toss a coin? :-)
outside the srouter source tree. Do you have in ser
now "*-dev" packaging?
No.
Andrei