8 May
2015
8 May
'15
5:42 p.m.
On a quick look, sdpops already exposes a function via api -- see
modules/sdpops/api.h. So most of the needed things are there, you just
need to extend the sdpops_api_t structure and bind_sdpops(...) function
to set the new field to the function pointer.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 08/05/15 16:37, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
practically you want to call a function from another compiled object
(like from a library). The way to do it is to expose the function you
want via an API structure and then bind to this module from your
module. This is quite common practice in kamailio -- for example, a
lot of modules connect to tm module to use its functions.
You can look at sl module how it exports some of its functions (the
structure sl_api_t and the function sl_load_api) and then at registrar
module to see how it bind and uses the api from sl module.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 08/05/15 16:07, Cockhootec Yahrabee wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
Hi guys,
I found this very useful function in `sdpops` module which I want to
use within my own module but I cannot find out how to forward its
declaration correctly so I can use it in my module.
Since `sdpops` has not defined it's functions within .h file I am
just simply forward declaring function I want to use in my .h file
like this:
int sdp_remove_codecs_by_name(sip_msg_t* msg, str* codecs);
And then I just calling it within my function. I can compile it and
linker won't give me any errors but when I am running Kamailio it
says that I have error in config file which is obviously not true
because if I comment code which uses forward declared function
kamailio runs without errors.
Kamailio log (when using forwarded declaration of sdpops function):
0(23096) DEBUG: <core> [route_struct.c:129]: mk_action(): ACTION_#2
#0/2: 3(3)/ 0x1
0(23096) DEBUG: <core> [route_struct.c:129]: mk_action(): ACTION_#2
#1/2: 3(3)/ 0x1
0(23096) DEBUG: <core> [route_struct.c:129]: mk_action(): ACTION_#16
#0/3: 22(16)/ 0x7f115fcfa898
0(23096) DEBUG: <core> [route_struct.c:129]: mk_action(): ACTION_#16
#1/3: 8(8)/ 0x7f115fcfaf98
0(23096) DEBUG: <core> [route_struct.c:129]: mk_action(): ACTION_#16
#2/3: 0(0)/ 0x7f1100000000
0(23096) DEBUG: <core> [route.c:129]: route_add(): mapping routing
block (0xa84a40)[MANAGE_FAILURE] to 1
ERROR: bad config file (1 errors)
0(23096) DEBUG: <core> [ppcfg.c:224]: pp_ifdef_level_check(): same
number of pairing preprocessor directives #!IF[N]DEF - #!ENDIF
0(23096) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:85]: tm_shutdown(): DEBUG: tm_shutdown
: start
0(23096) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:88]: tm_shutdown(): DEBUG: tm_shutdown
: emptying hash table
0(23096) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:90]: tm_shutdown(): DEBUG: tm_shutdown
: removing semaphores
0(23096) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:92]: tm_shutdown(): DEBUG: tm_shutdown
: destroying tmcb lists
0(23096) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:95]: tm_shutdown(): DEBUG: tm_shutdown
: done
0(23096) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:242]: shm_mem_destroy():
shm_mem_destroy
0(23096) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:245]: shm_mem_destroy():
destroying the shared memory lock
Did anybody resolved this issue? All help is appreciated.
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com